Habermas passed away just last night, and that felt symbolic to me — which is why I wanted to raise this. Habermas built democracy on communication, so I wanted to ask how communication is understood within Plurality. Communication is also central to information technology: a Shannon-type communication model passes noise through a filter to extract the meaningful signal it carries. But the communication Plurality aims at seems to be the opposite — recovering plurality, multiple voices, from what was previously dismissed as noise, letting them be heard as plural voices. How do you see it?
