Yeah, my question is a little different. Just to give you some context, most of us here around the room, either work for the UN, or they are diplomats that help in the UN to stay relevant. The UN is trying to be updated when it comes to the AI.
It customizes an AI tool. It's providing training to its employee to kind of catch up with the world. It started recently recruiting new positions as chief digital officers.
So in where you sit and in your work, if you are to be recruited as an advisor to the UN, how will you advise the UN to stay relevant and helpful in this sphere? So I know that a lot they see the UN as an enabler to access data, given how the UN works and with whom it works. But I'm interested to hear it from your own perspective.
Thank you.
我的問題稍微有些不同。為大家提供一些背景：在座的許多人要麼在聯合國工作，要麼是協助聯合國維持影響力的外交官。聯合國目前正試圖在 AI 領域跟上時代腳步。
它正在客製化 AI 工具，為員工提供培訓以跟上全球發展，最近也開始招募數位長（chief digital officers）等新職位。
從各位的專業視角與工作經驗出發，如果您被聘為聯合國顧問，您會如何建議聯合國在這個領域保持影響力並發揮實質作用？我知道很多人鑑於聯合國的運作模式和合作對象，將聯合國視為獲取資料的賦能者；但我很想聽聽各位自身的觀點。
謝謝。
