I see that.
They’re all in the private sectors, though?
Very important.
That’s right.
Like a reference implementation?
I like your wording. Crowdfunding campaigns on blockchain.
It’s really precise.
That’s exactly right.
The accountability part, which is the real important part.
This is consistent in the pre- and post-stages.
That’s awesome.
This public monitor is open not just for the people who come into it and people who in the alliance but really for the general public.
That’s great.
The next question would be, is it on a distributed ledger itself, like InterPlanetary File System or something like that? The blockchain is pretty good for this use also.
Oh really? Cool.
Vitalik has to change his Twitter handle to Vitalik "Not giving away Ethereum" Buterin.
Because it’s been asked so much. [laughs]
75 in general.
Then the one that are mandatory are...
Thank you.
Awesome.
What happens if you do do that?
I ask because in a crypto 1.0, before the whole blockchain stuff, we have the secure HTTP connection. The mark of a secure website is issued by, as you know, the certificate authorities, the issuers, which is very similar to this model.
There’s some rogue CAs that just randomly issue SSL certificates to I wouldn’t say malicious but negligent actors. After some point, that CA may be penalized by being removed by consensus of other root CAs from the root CA list. Basically, the issuing certificate for them for those websites no longer count as secure by a consensus of people who run the root CAs.
I’m just wondering whether there is such kind of a process when a supernode or multiple supernodes decide that a node is just not trustworthy where you can delist it or at least mark it somehow.
Obviously. I’m just saying that there is an existing what we call the public key infrastructure model that you can look toward as a way for the industry to self-regulate. Because, again, that is not government mandated, this is basically community of certificate issuers, exactly like this works.
It is a supernode level one.
Everybody, including humans and robots.
But there could be multiple supernodes within one jurisdiction?
Do they have to pay annual fee to be supernode?
Those three. Awesome. Thank you. This slide itself, is it public online on the GITA home page?
Because after 10 days of editing, I will be releasing this transcript. It would be awesome if we could just link to the gita.foundation home page so that people can actually understand what we’re talking about in the slides.
This is very well to put together. Congrats.
The next part will be the live demo?
This is an iPad. Feel free.
The percentage means the self-disclosure items, right?
The percentage of self-disclosure or whatever.
Yeah, sure, of course.
I think that -- sorry, but just nitpicking -- I think the slash between Taiho imposition and between bio and profile is kind of confusing. If you scroll down, you can see here, that like the slash here, and the slash here.
Usually, it’s like either/or, right? Bio and profile is pretty synonyms. It’s kind of confusing. What I’m saying is that maybe it makes sense to just use one word.
Yeah, I like the visual side though.
Yeah, I know. HR and everything like that.
If you have a newer demo, feel free just to hijack the airplane.
Yeah.
Sure, no problem.
This is in closed-beta, and there’s quite a few real cases on it already?
OK.
You can have some folded, and ellipses, and click to expand.
I’m sure. I think it’s a pretty good first prototype. It’s more obvious now that you’re showing this, if you have any example that is in a post stage, like post prior of sales, or post...
Yeah, is there any?
