I think the main insight that the internet brings is that the government should work with the people, not for the people, and sometimes after the people. That is to say, when the social innovators discover something that's genuinely good, the government should act as the RFC editors and the RFC editor community to amplify the rough consensus, or as I explain it to my fellow ministers, good enough consensus, so that people can actually innovate without first getting bogged down to the very fine consensus or getting bogged down to the top-down enforcement measures for those very fine consensus, right? So I think the point here is just to relax our expectation of what consensus means in a governance setting so that with something that's more or less good enough, then we just work on the running code in this case, well, legal code or norms.